Censorship as an Excuse for Lazy Parenting
Now that I’m firmly back to blogging from my month of NaNo, I’m ready to offer a few comments in support of Adam Lambert. The scandal arising out of his performance at the AMA Awards wasn’t all that surprising, and yet, at the same time it was rather saddening.
How quickly Americans expose their inner bigots when faced with something a little bit different from what they’re used to.
Adam Lambert Kissed A Man. On National Television. After 11 o’clock on a school night. Oh my god, the children might see.
What on earth sort of parents let their children watch TV that late at night, anyway? This is a case where people are calling out for censorship as a substitute for being responsible parents who, you know, take a hand in what they allow their children to watch and, when something potentially disturbing or worrisome shows up on those shows, discusses this and the implications of it with their children. Adam Lambert was absolutely correct in placing the responsibility of what children watch firmly with the parents rather than the entertainer.
Unfortunately, these lazy parents want to let their kids watch tv long after they should’ve been in bed, without them paying proper attention to what their kids might be watching. Needless to say, this wouldn’t have been an issue at all if the person that Adam decided to kiss was a girl. If Adam had decided to act out a grizzly murder on the stage, complete with spurting blood, well, that would’ve been okay too.
Censorship in this country is so incredibly backwards from the way it should be. When it comes to acts of love, or even completely non-sexual brands of nudity, the censorship organizations cut and mangle and block things out, but when it comes to violence, expressions of hate, the censors look the other way.
It shouldn’t work that way. Violence should be “worse” in the considerations of ratings and censoring than nudity or sex. A movie is more likely to get an R rating (or worse) here for nudity than it is for violence, and PG-13 movies continue to grow more and more violent as the years pass.
I’d be much more worried about my kids watching some of these violent PG-13 movies than some of the R rated movies that are tame, but for a moment of non-sexualized nudity, or, heaven forbid, gay kissing.
But then, it all goes back to the same thing. Enforcing “Morals” in this country these days tend to mean it’s okay to hate in public, but love and affection gets censored.








Recent Comments