"Reality" TV
Between the Balloon Boy Hoax and John & Kate, it’s hard to get any actual news on the news these days. It’s left me wondering (and honestly, despairing) about the apparent popularity of these shows.
My opinion on John & Kate is pretty concrete: The show should never have been made. It’s exploitation of children, plain and simple. To those who claim not: They are using their children to become wealthy. Is this not nearly a perfect definition of exploitation?
For the producers of these shows, the equation is pretty simple. They want to make money. Reality TV is cheap to produce. There’s no script, so they don’t have to hire writers. There’s no set or set designers to pay for. Presumably, the “stars” pick out and provide their own clothing, too, so no wardrobe or costume designers either. All you really need is a camera crew.
And people will watch. The ratings prove that. Experts call it a combination of empathy and Schadenfreude that keeps them watching: People both empathize with the people on the show, and at the same time, take pleasure in their failings and pain.
I’ve never found anything pleasurable or entertaining about Reality TV. At its basest level, it’s an oddly interdependent case of voyeurism on the part of the watchers, and narcissism on the part of the people exposing themselves. Where it’s sad is when some of the people being exposed (particularly children) are not in a position to choose whether that’s what they want. In both cases, the Gosselins and the balloon boy, the parents are using their children to get attention, and it really does seem that it’s attention, rather than money, that they want.
I can avoid the TV shows, but even then, these people invade the so-called “news” programs to an extent that, even having never watched the shows (and not having watched the coverage of that balloon), I, nevertheless, have been subjected to every detail of what’s going on.
How is this newsworthy? On celebrity TV shows it might make sense, but as sound-bytes in the middle of an otherwise supposedly serious journalism show?
If these people want to expose themselves, well, go ahead, I suppose, but children who cannot possibly understand what they’re doing should not be involved, and I really wish it would stay the hell out of my news shows. It’s not news.
I’d also ask that producers bring back good TV with a story, acting, and art. It might cost a bit more to produce, but at least it doesn’t ruin lives in the process.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Balloon Boy, Reality TV, Hoaxes and Legal Charges (medhealthwriter.blogspot.com)
- Television Review | ‘Adoption Diaries’: For Some Couples, the Goal Is Just ‘Plus 1′ (nytimes.com)
- Balloon Boy’s Parents Facing Charges (news.sky.com)













Recent Comments